Social Sciences

The association between gambling and financial, social and health outcomes in big financial data

Written by Mamie M. Arndt

1. Schwartz, D. G. Roll the Bones: The History of Gambling (Winchester Books, 2013). 2. Supreme Court of the United States. Murphy, Governor of New Jersey et al. versus National Collegiate Athletic Association et al. No. 138, 1461 (2018). 3. Industry Statistics (Gambling Commission, 2019); https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/PDF/survey-data/Gambling-industry-statistics.pdf 4. Cassidy, R. Vicious Games: Capitalism and Gambling (Pluto […]

  • 1.

    Schwartz, D. G. Roll the Bones: The History of Gambling (Winchester Books, 2013).

  • 2.

    Supreme Court of the United States. Murphy, Governor of New Jersey et al. versus National Collegiate Athletic Association et al. No. 138, 1461 (2018).

  • 3.

    Industry Statistics (Gambling Commission, 2019); https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/PDF/survey-data/Gambling-industry-statistics.pdf

  • 4.

    Cassidy, R. Vicious Games: Capitalism and Gambling (Pluto Press, 2020).

  • 5.

    Orford, J. The Gambling Establishment: Challenging the Power of the Modern Gambling Industry and its Allies (Routledge, 2019).

  • 6.

    Duncan, P., Davies, R. & Sweney, M. Children ‘bombarded’ with betting adverts during World Cup. The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jul/15/children-bombarded-with-betting-adverts-during-world-cup (15 July 2018).

  • 7.

    Hymas, C. Church of England backs ban on gambling adverts during live sporting events. The Telegraph https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/10/08/church-england-backs-ban-gambling-adverts-live-sporting-events/ (10 August 2018).

  • 8.

    McGee, D. On the normalisation of online sports gambling among young adult men in the UK: a public health perspective. Public Health 184, 89–94 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Editorial. Science has a gambling problem. Nature 553, 379 (2018).

  • 10.

    National Gambling Strategy (Gambling Commission, 2019); https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news-action-and-statistics/News/gambling-commission-launches-new-national-strategy-to-reduce-gambling-harms

  • 11.

    van Schalkwyk, M. C. I., Cassidy, R., McKee, M. & Petticrew, M. Gambling control: in support of a public health response to gambling. The Lancet 393, 1680–1681 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Wardle, H., Reith, G., Langham, E. & Rogers, R. D. Gambling and public health: we need policy action to prevent harm. BMJ 365, l1807 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Volberg, R. A. Fifteen years of problem gambling prevalence research: what do we know? Where do we go? J. Gambl. Issues https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2004.10.12 (2004).

  • 14.

    Select Committee on the Social and Economic Impact of the Gambling Industry. Corrected Oral Evidence: Social and Economic Impact of the Gambling Industry (UK Parliament, 2019); https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/15/html/

  • 15.

    Wardle, H. et al. British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010 (National Centre for Social Research, 2011); https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/243515/9780108509636.pdf

  • 16.

    Smith, G., Hodgins, D. & Williams, R. Research and Measurement Issues in Gambling Studies (Emerald, 2007).

  • 17.

    Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I. & Ross, D. The risk of gambling problems in the general population: a reconsideration. J. Gambl. Stud.36, 1133–1159 (2020).

  • 18.

    Wood, R. T. & Williams, R. J. ‘How much money do you spend on gambling?’ The comparative validity of question wordings used to assess gambling expenditure. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 10, 63–77 (2007).

  • 19.

    Toneatto, T., Blitz-Miller, T., Calderwood, K., Dragonetti, R. & Tsanos, A. Cognitive distortions in heavy gambling. J. Gambl. Stud. 13, 253–266 (1997).

  • 20.

    Wardle, H., John, A., Dymond, S. & McManus, S. Problem gambling and suicidality in England: secondary analysis of a representative cross-sectional survey. Public Health 184, 11–16 (2020).

  • 21.

    Karlsson, A. & Håkansson, A. Gambling disorder, increased mortality, suicidality, and associated comorbidity: a longitudinal nationwide register study. J. Behav. Addict. 7, 1091–1099 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Wong, P. W. C., Chan, W. S. C., Conwell, Y., Conner, K. R. & Yip, P. S. F. A psychological autopsy study of pathological gamblers who died by suicide. J. Affect. Disord. 120, 213–216 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., LaBrie, R. A. & Shaffer, H. J. Stability and progression of disordered gambling: lessons from longitudinal studies. Can. J. Psychiatry 53, 52–60 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Wohl, M. J. & Sztainert, T. Where did all the pathological gamblers go? Gambling symptomatology and stage of change predict attrition in longitudinal research. J. Gambl. Stud. 27, 155–169 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Browne, M., Goodwin, B. C. & Rockloff, M. J. Validation of the Short Gambling Harm Screen (SGHS): a tool for assessment of harms from gambling. J. Gambl. Stud. 34, 499–512 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Browne, M. et al. Assessing Gambling-related Harm in Victoria: A Public Health Perspective (Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation, 2016).

  • 27.

    Canale, N., Vieno, A. & Griffiths, M. D. The extent and distribution of gambling-related harms and the prevention paradox in a British population survey. J. Behav. Addict. 5, 204–212 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Salonen, A. H., Hellman, M., Latvala, T. & Castrén, S. Gambling participation, gambling habits, gambling-related harm, and opinions on gambling advertising in Finland in 2016. Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 35, 215–234 (2018).

  • 29.

    Langham, E. et al. Understanding gambling related harm: a proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms. BMC Public Health 16, 80 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Wardle, H., Reith, G., Best, D., McDaid, D. & Platt, S. Measuring Gambling-related Harms: A Framework for Action (Gambling Commission, 2018).

  • 31.

    Browne, M. & Rockloff, M. J. Prevalence of gambling-related harm provides evidence for the prevention paradox. J. Behav. Addict. 7, 410–422 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Collins, P., Shaffer, H. J., Ladouceur, R., Blaszszynski, A. & Fong, D. Gambling research and industry funding. J. Gambl. Stud. 36, 1–9 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Delfabbro, P. & King, D. L. Challenges in the conceptualisation and measurement of gambling-related harm. J. Gambl. Stud. 35, 743–755 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Browne, M. et al. What is the harm? Applying a public health methodology to measure the impact of gambling problems and harm on quality of life. J. Gambl. Issues https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2017.36.2 (2017).

  • 35.

    Markham, F., Young, M. & Doran, B. The relationship between player losses and gambling-related harm: evidence from nationally representative cross-sectional surveys in four countries. Addiction 111, 320–330 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Markham, F., Young, M. & Doran, B. Gambling expenditure predicts harm: evidence from a venue-level study. Addiction 109, 1509–1516 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R. & Shaffer, H. J. A science-based framework for responsible gambling: the Reno model. J. Gambl. Stud. 20, 301–317 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    Rose, G. The Strategy of Preventive Medicine (Oxford Univ. Press, 1992).

  • 39.

    Improving the Financial Health of the Nation (Financial Inclusion Commission, 2015); https://www.financialinclusioncommission.org.uk/pdfs/fic_report_2015.pdf

  • About the author

    Mamie M. Arndt